Joint Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance and Resisitivity Based Fluid Volumetrics - A Framework for Petrophysical Evaluation (Geoffrey Page, Baker Hughes - SPWLA Distinguished Speaker)

Joint Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance and Resisitivity Based Fluid Volumetrics - A Framework for Petrophysical Evaluation

by Geoffrey Page, Baker Hughes - SPWLA Distinguished Speaker

was presented on Wednesday the 1 st of February, 2017.


The accurate quantification of fluid volumes is one of the most important tasks for determining the economic value of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Resistivity-based fluid saturation calculations have been established for many decades with known benefits and challenges. More recently nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology has developed as an alternative, robust method for direct fluid volume estimation. Resistivity logging data are used to calculate saturation of conductive (e.g. water) versus non-conductive (e.g. hydrocarbon) fluids in the formation. NMR logging data capture information about pore size in the formation and, thus, separate movable fluids, usually residing in large pores, from bound fluids. The bound fluids are further sub-divided into clay-bound water components and irreducible components held by capillary forces. The movable water and hydrocarbon volumes can be estimated using simple T2 cutoff approaches or more sophisticated 2D-NMR methods (the latter of which are generally only available for wireline NMR applications).

As today’s reservoirs are becoming more challenging, conventional resistivity data evaluation involves increasing difficulties and ambiguities such as in complex lithology due to the presence of conductive minerals, low formation water salinity, fractures and vugs, or local variations in water resistivity. NMR data processing and interpretation are also not straight forward in complex carbonates and heavy oil reservoirs, as well as in case of wettability alteration and due to the presence of magnetic minerals. Ambiguities in either of the measurements can be efficaciously addressed by combining results from both approaches. In simple reservoirs, for instance, the combination of resistivty and NMR reduces uncertainties and can be used to identify and quantify effects such as invasion or water (-free) production.

We present a systematic compilation and discussion of main properties affecting resistivity and NMR fluid volume estimations such as Archie exponents and T2 cutoffs. This includes various reservoir types with various fluid types and measurement conditions. Guidelines will be provided on how to combine resistivity-based fluid volumetrics and NMR-based volumetrics most effectively. An unpublished and four previously published log examples illustrate a wide range of reservoir scenarios. In addition to the log interpretation aspect, we also relate the results to their applications ranging from real-time drilling optimization through hydrocarbon-in-place estimates and reservoir modeling input to production and completion decisions.

Geoffrey Page, CV

Geoffrey Page studied physics at the Royal College of Science in London. He began his oilfield career as a Dresser Atlas field engineer 36 years ago, moved into Petrophysics in Aberdeen 28 years ago, and is now Region Petrophysical Advisor for Baker Hughes based in Aberdeen. He is a former President of the Aberdeen chapter of the SPWLA (AFES) and was honoured with a life membership. He has written and presented many papers over the years, helped organise many of the conferences including SPWLA 2008 in Edinburgh, and in his spare time teaches the Petrophysics course of Aberdeen University’s "Integrated Petroleum Geoscience" MSc course.